|
#351
11-05-2009, 08:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members. I'd never give him that much credit. All his guys were recycled from previous failed administrations dating back to Nixon. They were even too inept a crowd for his daddy, who at least was smart enough to keep those guys at a distance. Junior just bent over for 'em. An idiot? Really? Because I can back my play? typical.
__________________
 
|
|
#352
11-05-2009, 08:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's 72 hours between friends
Pelosi Breaks Pledge to Put Final Health Care Bill Online for 72 Hours Before Vote Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD that the speaker will not allow the final language of the health care to be posted online for 72 hours before bringing the bill to a vote on the House floor, despite her September 24 statement that she was "absolutely" committed to doing so. House members are still negotiating important issues in the bill--whether it will provide taxpayer-funding for abortions, for example. Pelosi is pushing for a Saturday House vote, and a number of big changes will be introduced, likely less than 24 hours before the vote takes place (if in fact it does). The Rules Committee hasn't yet released its resolution, or rule, that must be passed before the bill can move from committee to the floor. The rule will set the terms of debate and determine what amendments are in order. It seems likely that the rule will allow very few, if any, up-or-down votes on amendments on the House floor. Rather, the rule will include a series of amendments that will all be adopted at once if the rule passes. On September 24, Speaker Nancy Pelosi told THE WEEKLY STANDARD that she was "absolutely" committed to putting the text of the final House bill online for 72 hours before the House votes: TWS: Madam Speaker, do you support the measure to put the final House bill online for 72 hours before it's voted on at the very end? PELOSI: Absolutely. Without question. But tonight, when asked if Speaker Pelosi will leave the bill online for 72 hours after we see what's in the rule, Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly replied in an email: "No; [the] pledge was to have manager?s amendment online for 72 hours, and we will do that." Apparently Pelosi's agreement to leave the "final" bill online "at the very end" of the process wasn't such a straightforward pledge. Posted by John McCormack on November 5, 2009 06:56 PM | Email the article Pelosi Breaks Pledge to Put Final Health Care Bill Online for 72 Hours Before Vote to a friend
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#353
11-05-2009, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
|
|
#354
11-05-2009, 08:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members. You sir, are way out of your depth talking politics with someone with any knowledge of facts. Which is kind of a shame, cause I don't know why, but I expected more out of you. And from these statements I now know you fit right in with Pred and rest of loony, misguided Tea-baggers. Happy discontent, cause based upon NY's 23rd District election results, it's gonna be a while before your teams on the field again.
__________________
|
|
#355
11-05-2009, 08:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
|
|
#356
11-05-2009, 08:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members. You still have yet to say what is so great about Obama. All you keep doing to talking about past administrations.
|
|
#357
11-05-2009, 09:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
|
|
#358
11-05-2009, 09:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Only thing I'm going to say is that past presidents actions haven't usually affected the country till 8-16 years AFTER they've left office. Until Obam, who's blatantly fucking the US while he's in office.
He's a throwaway president. That's what the party wanted. BOTH sides, not just the dems. I have clients who are major lobbyists and this is common and accepted knowledge. He was put in office because they had him by the balls in that they made him what he is and he knows it and is paying back favors. The only thing the current administration, house and reps (especially the speaker) care about is cementing THEIR longterm financial stability and wellbeing. Most are look at getting everything they can for themselves before they "retire". Obama isn't the power player he's being made out to be. Pelosi is the one in charge right now and until she's gone, the US will continue to sell itself off until it has no choice but to bow down before foreign powers and become part of an "American Union". A long time ago, one of my history teachers told me that records show that countries tend to only get about 250-275 years at best before they either totally collapse in turmoil, or go through a major political/social upheaval and restructure. Think about this, we're around 235 years depending on what you look at.
|
|
#359
11-05-2009, 09:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
|
|
#360
11-05-2009, 09:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only. REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
__________________
Is this the END? ... or are we starting over? 
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.