Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
I'm all for equality and here in California homosexual's can get all the same benefits as married couples and I voted to give them that privilege. This last election I didn't vote for or against this issue. I just skipped it for two reasons.
1. Marriage is a religious term. The Bible, the Torah, and the Koran all say homosexuality is an abomination. Since California residents already have the same benefits really all this boils down to is force feeding people that their religion is 100% against. Allowing gays to be called married would have no effect on how the couple is treated in other states since those states and the federal government haven't and probably won't accept homosexual marriage any time soon. So technically people waisted millions of dollars trying to change the name of what homosexuals here already enjoy.
It's like spending millions of dollars to get California to change the name of the color
blue to
bizzbop no matter where else you go people would still be calling it
blue and all you did is waist money.
2. Until homebody is able to prove that homosexuality is something you're born to be rather then a choice someone makes I don't see it as discriminatory. I know guy who cried discrimination when his boss turned him down for a management position because he had too many visible tattoos. He chose to get those tattoos on his knuckles and then cried fowl when that choice came back to bite him in the ass.
Either way. I skipped this one because I don't agree with the religious folk who think it's a sin, but I also don't think it's cool for San Fransisco to force their ideals on the rest of the nation who in their heart think this is a sin. When someone proves that this is not a choice and people are actually born gay I'll agree 100% with letting them be married.