Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
My point is this, they read it possibly, I don't know I wasn't there. You're okay with getting 3rd party information as long as it furthers your views and we're all free to do that. I don't believe in other people telling me whats wrong, if I have to ability (and I do because the bill is online) why wouldn't I make the effort to read it myself? I'm a small government guy too, but I'm all too observant of commentary being construed as fact. Why I was pointing out where this was coming from was because when a researcher already has a preconceived idea of the result, what are they going to arrive at? You get what you look for.
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
Its a non argument because I'm doing both.
I am reading the bill, but its been rewritten so many times I'm honestly getting a bit lost.
Ultimately what I'm saying is that what responsible people do is read the facts and make up their own views on a subject. I don't need my facts predigested.