Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
Code:
Content, Pictures and Download links visible to registered users only.
REGISTER NOW to access all areas that are invisible to non-members.
That was an observation, not a criticism. A criticism would have been something like, "she's a whorish old hag who's years past her sell by date."
The observations were:
1. I didn't need to ever see that.
2. I don't think she was hot even when she was younger.
Further, I suggested that she be rendered as a draft animal.
No where did I say how she should behave, nor did I make any judgements, except of my own action in looking at the link.
If you have a dire need to argue and be humiliated, then just continue as you are. If you want to argue competently, I suggest you take about 18 hours of logic and reasoned thinking.